| |
KQ6UP > PACKET 19.05.26 15:33l 18 Lines 642 Bytes #55 (0) @ WW
BID : 7376_KQ6UP
Read: GAST OE5RCO
Subj: XZ Compression
Path: DB0FFL<OE2XZR<DB0FHN<DB0RKB<DK0WUE<HB9ON<IK7NXU<IK6IHL<IZ3LSV<I0OJJ<
N2NOV<KQ6UP
Sent: 260519/1307Z 7376@KQ6UP.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM BPQ6.0.24
>From kq6up%kq6up.#sca.ca.usa.noam@i0ojj.ampr.org Tue May 19 15:09:00 2026
Received: from i0ojj.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0q.1) with SMTP
id AA17060002 ; Tue, 19 May 2026 15:09:00 +0200
Message-Id: <7376_KQ6UP@n2nov.bbs>
>From: kq6up@kq6up.#sca.ca.usa.noam
X-JNOS-User-Port: Circuit (ARECS:N2NOV-7 N2NOV-7) -> Sending message
I find that if I use XZ to compress my attachments prior to
sending them as a 7plus file, I get the smallest possible file.
As far I know, XZ has the highest compression ratio at the
expense of a lot of processing time to compress.
To "unzip" use the command unxz in Linux/UNIX.
-73 de Chris KQ6UP
Lese vorherige Mail | Lese naechste Mail
| |
