| |
I0OJJ > PACKET 19.05.26 20:02l 52 Lines 1604 Bytes #55 (0) @ WW
BID : 1BZ_IR0EQ
Read: OE5RCO GAST
Subj: Re: XZ Compression
Path: DB0FFL<OE2XZR<OE6XPE<DB0RKB<DK0WUE<HB9ON<IK7NXU<IK6IHL<IZ3LSV<I0OJJ<
N2NOV<KC2NJV<LU9DCE<EA2RCF<IR0EQ
Sent: 260519/1743z @:IR0EQ.ITA.EU [Rome] $:1BZ_IR0EQ
>From i0ojj%ir0eq.ita.eu@i0ojj.ampr.org Tue May 19 19:47:33 2026
Received: from i0ojj.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0q.1) with SMTP
id AA17060025 ; Tue, 19 May 2026 19:47:33 +0200
Message-Id: <1BZ_IR0EQ@n2nov.bbs>
>From: i0ojj@ir0eq.ita.eu
X-JNOS-User-Port: Circuit (ARECS:N2NOV-7 N2NOV-7) -> Sending message
>From i0ojj@rgate.ampr.org Tue May 19 19:43:23 2026
Received: from rgate.ampr.org by rgate.ampr.org (JNOS2.0q.1) with SMTP
id AA1727 ; Tue, 19 May 2026 19:43:23 +0200
Received: by rgate.ampr.org with SMTP
id AA1724 ; Tue, 19 May 2026 19:42:51 +0200
Message-Id: <1725@rgate.ampr.org>
>From: i0ojj@rgate.ampr.org
That's OK all.
Try also the .bz2, txz and perhaps the .lz.
Every kinda compressor own switches for further
compression, too.
--
73 and ciao, gustavo i0ojj
non multa, sed multum
-----------
Date: 19 May 26 13:07:00 GMT
From: kq6up@kq6up.#sca.ca.usa.noam
To: packet@ww
Subject: XZ Compression
Path: I0OJJ!N2NOV!KQ6UP
>From kq6up%kq6up.#sca.ca.usa.noam@i0ojj.ampr.org Tue May 19 15:09:00 2026
Received: from i0ojj.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0q.1) with SMTP
id AA17060002 ; Tue, 19 May 2026 15:09:00 +0200
Message-Id: <7376_KQ6UP@n2nov.bbs>
>From: kq6up@kq6up.#sca.ca.usa.noam
X-JNOS-User-Port: Circuit (ARECS:N2NOV-7 N2NOV-7) -> Sending message
I find that if I use XZ to compress my attachments prior to
sending them as a 7plus file, I get the smallest possible file.
As far I know, XZ has the highest compression ratio at the
expense of a lot of processing time to compress.
To "unzip" use the command unxz in Linux/UNIX.
-73 de Chris KQ6UP
-----------
Lese vorherige Mail | Lese naechste Mail
| |
