| |
I0OJJ > SYSOP 04.05.24 15:34l 35 Lines 991 Bytes #999 (5) @ WW
BID : 45YI0OJJ_002
Read: GAST
Subj: Return to 'stone age'
Path: DB0FFL<DB0FHN<DB0RKB<DK0WUE<DB0ERF<OK0NAG<OK0NBR<SR1BSZ<IW0QNL<JH4XSY<
JE7YGF<LU4ECL<I0OJJ
Sent: 240504/1228z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU [Rome] obcm1.08-6-g5b69 LT:005
From: I0OJJ @ I0OJJ.ITA.EU (Gustavo)
To: SYSOP @ WW
X-Info: Sent with login password
Hi,
more and more often the trend of defacing the SID has become
increasingly popular.
History has taught us to find new techniques to improve
transmissions, in our case packet or packet radio.
Thus the B1F protocol which essentially reduces the traffic of
transmissions by 50 to more percent, which produce the following:
[BPQ-6.0.24.1-B1FIHJM$]
proposal FA B LU9DCE WW DXNEWS 9194_LU9DCE 8851
the question is this: why throw these techniques away and use
the following bad setting instead?
[BPQ-6.0.24.36-IHJM$]
incoming proposal sB dxnews @ ww < lu9dce $9194_lu9dce
and the above is operated over the radio links, too.
I know the reason... but why your forward partner continue
to use stone age programs, not compatible at least with
the B1F?
So, to say that with an Italian slang: but is your wife
happy if you spend double the amount you should on shopping?
triple :)
73, gustavo i0ojj
Lese vorherige Mail | Lese naechste Mail
| |
